Israeli–Palestinian Peace Proposal®
A Solution to the Middle East Conflict
A 27-Chapter Framework for Sovereign, Self-Funding Peace
dealapeace@gmail.com |
Registered: U.S. Copyright Office · WGA West
Plan A — Short Version
For more than seven decades, the world has witnessed a painful and repeating cycle in the Middle East. Brilliant diplomats have drafted agreements. World leaders have shaken hands. Frameworks have been signed, celebrated, and photographed. And yet, without exception, every initiative has either collapsed or stalled — not because the plans were poorly designed, but because the human beings implementing them were operating from the wrong internal system.
Fear. Ego. Historical grievance. Scarcity thinking. The belief that peace is a zero-sum game — that for one side to win, the other must lose. These are not political problems. They are human problems. And no political document, however sophisticated, has ever solved a human problem.
This is the gap that HUGE fills. And without it, this peace proposal — like every one before it — risks the same fate.
HUGE — Human Greatness Education — is not a self-help program or a motivational seminar. It is a universal operating system for human thinking, developed over 25 years and tested across cultures, languages, and professional environments. Its principles have been embraced by graduates on five continents who hold HUGE Life Licenses — a commitment to being the difference that benefits mankind for peace on earth.
The analogy is precise and important: a computer has hardware and software. The hardware — circuits, chips, processors — is the physical structure. But without software, it cannot function. It is an empty machine.
The Israeli-Palestinian Peace Proposal is the hardware. Twenty-seven meticulously crafted chapters covering sovereignty, legal frameworks, land transactions, economic development, regional security, and international participation. It is comprehensive, fair, and executable. But it is hardware. Without the right software running inside the minds of those who must implement it, it will not run. HUGE is that software.
HUGE brings four essential principles to the negotiating table — principles that transform how decision-makers think, speak, and act under pressure:
1. Integrity Agreements — Participants commit not merely to legal terms, but to a standard of honesty, transparency, and follow-through as a way of being. When integrity is the foundation, manipulation and bad faith become structurally impossible.
2. Breakdown to Breakthrough — In every peace process, there comes a moment of crisis. Under conventional thinking, this moment ends negotiations. Under HUGE, it is understood as the natural doorway to deeper resolution. Crisis is not failure — it is the turning point. This reframe alone has the power to save agreements that would otherwise collapse.
3. Clean Slate — Seven decades of trauma, loss, displacement, and injustice cannot be erased. But they can be consciously set aside — not forgotten, but no longer used as a weapon. The Clean Slate principle creates the psychological space for new possibility to emerge, without requiring anyone to pretend the past did not happen.
4. Ocean of Abundance — The deepest obstacle to peace is the belief that resources, recognition, and dignity are limited — that if the other side gains, we lose. HUGE replaces this scarcity mindset with the understanding that peace itself generates abundance. Economic growth, regional stability, international investment, and human dignity expand for everyone when the conflict ends. There is enough. There has always been enough.
History has shown us, repeatedly, that agreements without transformed thinking do not hold. The Oslo Accords. Camp David. The Abraham Accords. Each represented genuine effort. Each fell short of lasting peace because the hardware was present but the software was not.
What makes this proposal different is not simply its 27 chapters, its legal precision, or its economic framework — though all of these are exceptional. What makes it different is that it is built on a foundation of human transformation. HUGE is not added to the proposal as an afterthought. It is the operating system on which the entire plan runs.
A computer without software is a box. A human being without a universal (HUGE) how-to-think system acts from instinct, fear, and habit. A peace proposal without HUGE is words on paper — destined to join the long list of documents that inspired hope and delivered disappointment.
Together — the proposal as hardware, HUGE as software — they form the first truly complete, executable framework for lasting peace in the Middle East. One cannot function without the other. And together, they give humanity something it has never had before: a real chance.
Gadi Singer Zamir — Author, Israeli-Palestinian Peace Proposal® · Creator, HUGE Life License · dealapeace.com
Overview of the full proposal structure
This chapter presents the strategic architecture of the proposal: a transactional agreement in which every party — Israel, Palestine, Qatar, and the United States — receives something of concrete, measurable value.
The central mechanism is the Israel–Qatar Land and Asset Purchase Agreement, through which Qatar acquires Israeli-held territory at full market value, generating the financial foundation for the entire peace architecture.
Israel monetizes its sovereign assets and uses the proceeds to establish a new, prosperous community with full democratic continuity in a host nation. Palestine achieves full statehood and territorial sovereignty.
Two governing bodies administer the transition: IROA (Israel Relocation and Operations Authority) on the Israeli side, and QRDA (Qatar Real Estate and Development Authority) on the Palestinian side.
The proposal is organized into three groups: Sovereignty and Legal Framework (Chapters 1–9), Economics and Transaction Structure (Chapters 10–18), and Implementation and Regional Security (Chapters 19–27).
No new international aid is required — the deal is entirely self-funding, drawing on the existing asset value of the land and infrastructure being transferred.
This is not a document asking parties to trust each other — it is a structural contract in which trust is replaced by legally binding obligations and financially verifiable commitments.
This chapter presents an unflinching assessment of Israel’s current condition — the security threats, demographic pressures, economic costs, and political fractures that make the status quo unsustainable.
The events of October 7, 2023 exposed the limits of Israel’s strategy: that military superiority and geographic control could indefinitely substitute for political resolution.
Israel simultaneously faces threats on multiple fronts — Gaza, the West Bank, Lebanon, Syria, Iran, Yemen — while its international isolation at the ICJ, the UN, and in European capitals deepens as a structural trend.
Demographically, the data is stark: within a generation, Jewish Israelis will no longer constitute a majority in the territory between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean.
Economically, the cost of perpetual security spending, boycotts, and investment uncertainty is quantified in specific figures showing precisely what Israel pays, in GDP terms, for the absence of peace.
Israel’s greatest assets — its technology sector, educated population, international diaspora — would thrive far more in a stable, post-conflict environment. The occupation is Israel’s greatest liability, not its protection.
This chapter does not condemn Israel — it presents the evidence that points, with unavoidable clarity, toward the necessity of a fundamentally different direction.
This chapter provides the historical record that informs every legal, moral, and financial argument in the proposal — from the Balfour Declaration of 1917 to the crisis of October 7, 2023.
It documents the 1948 War of Independence from multiple perspectives: the Israeli experience of survival after the Holocaust, and the Palestinian experience of mass displacement known as the Nakba.
Every major armed conflict — 1948, 1956, 1967, 1973, 1982, 2006, and the Gaza wars of 2008 through 2023 — is analyzed not as isolated events but as chapters in a single unresolved story.
The Oslo Accords, Camp David 2000, the Annapolis Process, and the Arab Peace Initiative are each examined to identify the specific failure patterns that any new framework must be designed to avoid.
The chapter establishes the legal basis for both Israeli and Palestinian claims — acknowledging the legitimacy of both without resolving the contradiction through wishful thinking.
Every mechanism in this proposal is designed specifically to address the failure patterns documented in this chapter.
History does not condemn the future — it illuminates the specific changes required to produce a different outcome.
This chapter presents a data-driven portrait of Palestinian life in 2024: in Gaza under blockade and bombardment, in the West Bank under occupation, in refugee camps across Jordan, Lebanon, and Syria, and in the global diaspora.
The 2023–2024 conflict has created a humanitarian catastrophe of historic proportions: infrastructure obliterated, hospitals destroyed, and millions displaced in waves of unprecedented scale.
The Palestinian Authority is documented as deeply compromised — widely perceived as corrupt, unable to deliver basic services, and increasingly viewed by its own population as an obstacle rather than a solution.
Hamas is analyzed not as an ideological abstraction but as a political organization that grew directly from the failure of secular Palestinian nationalism — a product of the conditions this proposal seeks to change.
Palestinian refugee camps in Jordan, Lebanon, and Syria hold multigenerational communities trapped in a temporariness that has lasted 76 years — the third and fourth generation of families who never returned.
Despite everything, Palestinian educational attainment remains remarkably high — a cultural commitment to learning that this proposal seeks to give the political and economic environment it deserves.
Palestinian aspirations are not radical: statehood, sovereignty, dignity, the right to return, and an economy that works — all of which this proposal directly and specifically addresses.
This chapter provides the complete historical narrative of the Palestinian people — from the pre-1948 population of Mandatory Palestine through the Nakba, the refugee crisis, the rise of the PLO, and seven decades of statelessness.
The 1948 war resulted in the displacement of approximately 700,000 Palestinians — a catastrophe known as the Nakba that remains the defining event of Palestinian national identity across every subsequent generation.
Palestinian refugee camps, established as temporary facilities in 1948, became permanent communities — 76 years later, home to the third and fourth generations of the original displaced families.
The Oslo Accords are examined in detail: the specific provisions Palestinians agreed to, the specific commitments Israel failed to fulfill, and the specific moment at which the process collapsed.
The Right of Return, grounded in UN Resolution 194 (1948), is traced to its historical roots — explaining why this issue has proved so resistant to every previous political resolution.
Palestinian cultural production — literature, poetry, film, music, art — is documented as national resistance and identity preservation through 76 years of statelessness.
This chapter is a document of human endurance — and a call to the world’s decision-makers to honor the obligations that were made and broken over seven decades.
This chapter makes a specific operational argument: every previous peace process has failed not because of the absence of goodwill, but because of the presence of cameras.
Every significant negotiation of the past three decades — Oslo, Camp David, Wye River, Annapolis, the Kerry initiative — collapsed not at the negotiating table but in the arena of public opinion.
When negotiations are public, every concession becomes a domestic political liability, every compromise becomes a betrayal, and every negotiator must manage their public image more than the actual substance of the talks.
The only successful model for conflict resolution has consistently been confidential negotiation first and public announcement second — from the back-channel contacts that preceded Oslo to the secret diplomacy that produced the Egypt-Israel peace treaty.
Qatar is identified as the ideal host for confidential negotiations: diplomatic relations with all relevant parties, a track record of successful mediation, and the financial capacity to provide security and facilities.
This chapter is addressed directly to heads of state: it explains why the conversation about this proposal should happen in private before it ever happens in public.
Secrecy is not a moral failing in this framework — it is a structural necessity, and this chapter treats it as such.
IROA is one of the two institutional pillars of the entire peace architecture: the bi-national body that manages every element of the Israeli side of the transition.
Its mandate covers the complete spectrum of Israeli transition logistics: asset inventory and valuation, escrow management, compensation disbursement, relocation coordination, and community establishment in the host nation.
IROA’s escrow management function ensures that Qatar’s payments flow directly to individual Israeli beneficiaries through a transparent, auditable system — preventing political manipulation and ensuring every citizen receives what they are owed.
Governance safeguards include independent auditors, international observers, a rotating supervisory board, and a whistleblower protection framework — all designed to prevent corruption and political interference.
IROA’s budget is funded from a percentage of transaction proceeds, making it financially independent of any government.
IROA is explicitly not a deportation mechanism: all relocation is voluntary, fully compensated, and supported by comprehensive services designed to make the transition as smooth as possible.
IROA, together with QRDA, transforms the peace agreement from a piece of paper into a living institution capable of delivering its promises.
QRDA is Qatar’s institutional counterpart to IROA: the body responsible for managing Qatar’s acquisition of Israeli-held territory and channeling those assets into the construction of the Palestinian state.
QRDA’s acquisition function covers the complete range of assets being transferred: residential properties, commercial real estate, agricultural land, industrial facilities, public infrastructure, and military installations.
QRDA’s development function is the engine of Palestinian state-building: housing for returning refugees, government buildings, transportation networks, hospitals, schools, and the complete physical apparatus of a modern economy.
Qatar’s acquisition cost is structured as a long-term real estate investment, with the acquired assets projected to generate economic returns that offset the purchase price over a 30–50 year horizon.
QRDA’s relationship with the Palestinian Authority is defined carefully: QRDA develops the physical infrastructure, but Palestinian sovereignty is absolute and unconditional. Qatar is a developer, not a landlord.
Cultural sensitivity protocols require QRDA to respect and preserve Palestinian architectural heritage, cultural sites, and community identities in all its development activities.
Together, IROA and QRDA represent something genuinely new in peace-making: not a set of political promises but a pair of institutions designed to deliver those promises through concrete, measurable, accountable action.
This chapter presents the full bilateral negotiating framework as a formal diplomatic instrument — not a summary of talking points but an actual working document that senior negotiators could use as the basis for formal talks.
Israel’s negotiating positions are defined in detail: the minimum compensation levels required for political support, the security guarantees that are non-negotiable, and the cultural protections that are essential.
Qatar’s acquisition objectives are equally defined: the specific asset categories it seeks, the payment structure that is financially sustainable, and the diplomatic recognition it seeks in return.
The chapter presents the specific legal instruments required: a Treaty of Transfer between Israel and Qatar, a Framework Agreement on Palestinian Statehood, and a UN Security Council resolution of endorsement.
The specific obstacles that previous negotiations encountered — Jerusalem, the Right of Return, security, the fate of settlers — are each addressed, with specific explanations of how the transactional framework resolves them.
The timeline: 6 months of preliminary confidential talks, 12 months of formal bilateral negotiations, 6 months of multilateral endorsement and ratification, and a 10-year implementation period.
The proposal is not waiting for someone to invent the process — the process is already designed, documented, and ready to begin. The only thing it needs is the decision to start.
This chapter presents the financial core of the entire proposal: the specific contractual mechanism through which Qatar purchases Israeli-held territory and assets, generating the capital that funds every other element of the peace architecture.
The Agreement covers all categories of Israeli-held assets: residential properties (approximately 2.5 million housing units), commercial real estate, agricultural land, industrial facilities, public infrastructure, and military installations.
The payment structure is designed for financial sustainability: an initial down payment at signing, followed by structured tranches over 30 years, with interest rate and inflation adjustment mechanisms protecting both parties.
Individual Israeli citizens are direct beneficiaries: every household receives a compensation package proportional to the value of their assets, structured as a combination of immediate cash, deferred payments, and investment instruments.
The Agreement requires no political concession from either party — it is a straightforward commercial transaction in which both sides receive full value for what they give.
Qatar’s long-term financial return is modeled in detail: the acquired assets, properly developed and managed, are projected to generate returns that offset the purchase price over a 30–50 year horizon.
The deal funds itself. That is its genius and its strength.
This chapter addresses what happens to the Israel Defense Forces — its equipment, infrastructure, and human capital — as part of the transition from the current Israeli state to the new sovereign community.
The chapter provides a comprehensive inventory of IDF assets: ground forces equipment, air force assets including F-35s and advanced UAVs, naval vessels, missile defense systems, and intelligence infrastructure.
The disposition of military assets flows through three channels: sale to authorized allied nations, transfer to an international security force, or decommissioning under international supervision.
Israel’s undeclared nuclear capability is addressed with particular care: a specific disarmament protocol supervised by the IAEA, with full international security guarantees for Israel during and after the process.
Israeli military personnel — officers, intelligence professionals, cyber specialists, engineers — are treated as human assets with enormous civilian value, with a specific career transition program for each category.
Security guarantees for Israel during and after the transition are specified: a U.S.-led international security guarantee and a bilateral security arrangement with the host nation.
A people that no longer needs to spend 5% of its GDP on defense is a people that can invest that capital in the future.
This chapter addresses the most psychologically important practical question for any Israeli considering the proposal: how quickly, and through what mechanisms, can they access the compensation they are owed?
The Early Cash-Out Framework is a suite of financial instruments that allow Israelis to access the present value of their future compensation immediately, without waiting for the full transaction to close.
The Advance Payment Program provides immediate cash to every Israeli household upon enrollment. The Mortgage Relief Program discharges outstanding home loans as part of the asset transfer.
The Business Continuity Loan Program provides bridge financing for Israeli businesses. The Pension Bridge Payment guarantees pension payments from the moment of enrollment, regardless of the pace of asset transfer.
The financial architecture underlying these instruments — the escrow structure, the liquidity facilities provided by international financial institutions — is presented in detail.
Tax implications are addressed with a specific framework ensuring Israelis are not penalized for receiving what is effectively a compulsory purchase of their assets.
No one who participates in this program will be left financially worse off than before — and most will be significantly better off.
The announcement of an agreement of this magnitude would create immediate, powerful tremors in financial markets, and this chapter presents the complete framework for managing those tremors before they become a crisis.
The primary stabilization tool is a temporary, internationally guaranteed currency peg: anchoring the Shekel to the US Dollar or Euro for the duration of the transition period, eliminating speculative uncertainty.
The Bank of Israel’s role is specified in detail, including its foreign exchange reserve deployment strategy and the conditions under which it would activate emergency liquidity facilities.
The IMF coordination framework is presented: a pre-negotiated stand-by agreement giving Israel access to emergency liquidity if market pressures exceed the Bank of Israel’s capacity to manage them alone.
Capital controls — temporary restrictions on large-scale capital outflows — are proposed as a bridge measure, with design features that protect ordinary Israelis while preventing speculative attacks.
The long-term currency transition — from Shekel to the currency of the host nation — is addressed through a roadmap spanning the first five years of the relocation period.
Financial stability during the transition is not a side issue — it is a precondition for everything else, and this chapter treats it with the seriousness it deserves.
The Israeli-Palestinian conflict has never been a bilateral matter — it is embedded in a regional web of interests involving the entire Arab world, and this chapter addresses that web directly.
Jordan is the most immediately affected neighbor: with 2.3 million registered Palestinian refugees and a majority-Palestinian population, any change in the Palestinian situation has immediate implications for Jordanian stability.
Egypt’s role in Gaza transition, Saudi Arabia’s normalization pathway, Lebanon’s Palestinian refugee population, and Syria’s territorial relationship to the conflict are each addressed with specific frameworks.
A Regional Normalization Roadmap is presented: a sequenced process through which Arab states formally recognize both the Palestinian state and the relocated Israeli community.
The economic dimensions of regional normalization are quantified: the enormous gains available to Arab states from full economic integration with an Israeli community that maintains its technological and commercial capabilities.
Shared water resources — the Jordan River, the coastal aquifer, and the mountain aquifer — are addressed with a specific water-sharing framework governing the new regional arrangements.
The Arab world stands to gain more from this proposal than any other single party: the permanent resolution of the conflict that has distorted Arab politics, justified authoritarian governance, and prevented economic integration for 76 years.
The Israeli settlement enterprise in the West Bank is one of the most politically explosive elements of the entire conflict, and this chapter addresses it with the specificity and seriousness it deserves.
There are approximately 700,000 Israeli settlers in 132 officially recognized settlements and over 100 unofficial outposts — a population larger than many countries, deeply embedded in the landscape.
The Buy-Out Program is designed to be financially irresistible: above-market valuations for all properties, a guaranteed relocation package to the Israeli autonomous zone, and a fast-track process for early enrollees.
The phased handover timeline begins with isolated settlements and concludes with the large settlement blocs adjacent to the 1967 Green Line, with international monitoring at every stage.
The legal complexity of settlement land ownership — competing claims under international, Israeli, and Jordanian law — is addressed with a specific legal framework for resolving each category of case.
The chapter refuses to demonize settlers: they are presented as human beings making rational decisions in response to the incentives available to them, and this proposal changes those incentives fundamentally.
When the financial terms are right, people move. That is the core insight of this chapter.
The total cost of the Qatar–Israel Land and Asset Purchase Agreement requires Qatar to think creatively about how it finances its commitment, and this chapter presents the complete financial strategy for doing so.
Qatar’s sovereign wealth fund, the Qatar Investment Authority (QIA), currently manages approximately $475 billion in assets — the starting point for the financing strategy but not sufficient on its own.
A multi-component financing architecture is proposed: QIA equity commitment, international bond issuance, GCC co-investment from Saudi Arabia and the UAE, phased payment structuring, and revenue generation from the acquired assets.
The International Peace Bond is a specific financial instrument designed to attract global investors to participate in the financing of the agreement in exchange for guaranteed returns backed by the acquired real estate.
A 50-year financial model shows how Qatar’s investment generates economic returns that offset the purchase price through real estate development, energy infrastructure, tourism, and commercial activity.
Qatar’s financial commitment, properly structured, is not a burden but an investment — one that establishes Qatar as the dominant economic power in the post-agreement Middle East.
Qatar has the capacity to make this happen. This chapter explains exactly how to deploy it.
The Qatar–Palestinians Agreement is the heart of the proposal: the bilateral framework that transforms Palestinian statehood from an abstract aspiration into a concrete, legally binding, funded reality.
The foundational principle is stated clearly: Qatar acquires the land from Israel, but sovereignty over that land belongs unconditionally to the Palestinian state. Qatar is a developer and investor, not an occupying power.
The sovereignty transfer is immediate and unconditional: the Palestinian state comes into existence on a specific date, with full international recognition, complete territorial sovereignty, and membership in all relevant international institutions.
Qatar’s development partnership is defined as a 25-year commitment providing infrastructure investment and technical assistance — but without political conditions or governance interference of any kind.
The refugee return program provides the right of all Palestinians to return to the new state, with a phased program of organized return over the first decade of statehood.
The integration of Hamas and the Palestinian Authority into a unified governing structure is addressed through a specific framework for elections, power-sharing during a transition period, and long-term democratic consolidation.
The Palestinian state described in this chapter is not a dream deferred. It is a construction project ready to begin.
This chapter addresses the legal status, political rights, and social protections of Palestinian women in the constitutional framework of the new Palestinian state.
The establishment of a new Palestinian state offers a historic opportunity to build gender equality into the constitutional foundations from the very beginning — rather than trying to reform entrenched discriminatory structures after the fact.
The constitutional framework includes specific guarantees: equal citizenship rights, equal access to education and employment, equal political participation, equal property rights, and specific protections against gender-based violence.
The Independent Women’s Rights Commission is the institutional guarantee: an independent body with enforcement powers, a budget protected from political interference, and direct access to the constitutional court.
A quota system for the new state’s transitional parliament ensures women have a meaningful voice in the constitutional process itself — shaping the rules that will govern them.
The chapter presents international comparisons — Rwanda, Tunisia, Iceland — as evidence that rapid progress in gender equality is achievable when the right constitutional framework is in place.
A state that fails its women has failed half of its people, and this proposal refuses to accept that failure.
This chapter presents the complete operational plan for the physical return of the Palestinian people to their sovereign state — one of the largest humanitarian logistics operations in modern history.
The scale: approximately 5–7 million Palestinian refugees and displaced persons, scattered across Gaza, the West Bank, Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, and diaspora communities on every continent.
The phased return program begins with Palestinians from Lebanon and Syria, where conditions are worst, and progresses through diaspora communities and those already in the Palestinian territories.
A 10-year housing construction program, designed by Palestinian architects and building on Palestinian cultural traditions, provides genuinely livable housing for returning families.
Infrastructure development runs in parallel: water systems, electricity grids, road networks, telecommunications, hospitals, schools, and the complete physical apparatus of a modern state.
The economic integration plan — job creation, business establishment, agricultural development, and technology sector construction — is designed to build a functional, prosperous state within 10 years of signing.
Everything else in this proposal — every dollar, every institution, every negotiation — exists to make this chapter possible.
This chapter presents the complete operational framework for the organized, voluntary, fully compensated relocation of approximately 9 million Israeli citizens to a new sovereign community.
The governing principles: the relocation is voluntary, fully compensated at above-market rates, supported by comprehensive services at every stage, and designed to preserve Israeli community cohesion throughout.
Brazil is presented as the primary relocation destination: vast available territory, a democratic government, an existing Jewish community, and an economy that would benefit enormously from the Israeli community’s arrival.
The autonomous zone framework allows the preservation of Hebrew language, Jewish religious and cultural life, Israeli legal traditions, and democratic institutions — all under Brazilian sovereignty.
Israeli democratic institutions — the Knesset, the Supreme Court, the Bank of Israel, and the educational system — all relocate intact, preserving the democratic culture that is among Israel’s most important achievements.
The relocation is phased over 5–10 years: early movers attracted by enhanced incentives, followed by the bulk of the population, concluding with those most attached to specific places.
A new beginning, fully funded, in a country of their own choosing: that is what this chapter offers.
This chapter addresses the question that concerns many Israelis most deeply: what happens to the State of Israel — its government, its institutions, its democratic structures — during the transition period?
The answer is the Israeli Government in Exile: a fully functional democratic government that continues to exercise sovereign authority over Israeli citizens throughout the entire transition.
The precedent is extensive: the Polish government-in-exile in London during World War II, the Free French government under de Gaulle, and more recent post-Soviet examples all demonstrate that democratic legitimacy can be preserved during territorial transition.
The Knesset continues to legislate, the Supreme Court continues to adjudicate, the executive continues to govern — all from a temporary location in the host nation or a neutral third country.
IROA provides the physical infrastructure for government-in-exile operations: offices, communications systems, logistical support, and the administrative capacity to manage a government serving millions of citizens in transition.
Israel’s embassies and consulates around the world continue to operate, maintaining the diplomatic relationships and international legal status that are essential to the country’s interests.
The Israeli state is not ended by this proposal — it is transformed. The flag, the anthem, the democratic institutions, the culture, the language, and the people all continue, in a new place, building a new future.
Brazil is not an arbitrary choice as the primary destination for the relocated Israeli community — it is the result of a systematic analysis of every potential host nation, and this chapter presents the complete case.
Brazil offers the right combination: vast territories of underutilized land, a democratic government with a history of welcoming immigrants, and an economy hungry for the human capital the Israeli community would bring.
Israel’s technology sector would be a transformative contribution to Brazil’s economy: the potential for a Silicon Valley-style innovation hub, partnerships with Brazilian universities, and massive job creation.
Israeli precision agriculture and drip irrigation technology applied to Brazil’s vast potential could make Brazil one of the world’s dominant food producers.
The autonomous zone framework provides the Israeli community with the self-governance rights it needs: Hebrew as an official language, Jewish religious institutions, Israeli legal traditions, and democratic governance.
Brazil’s existing Jewish community of approximately 120,000 — the largest in Latin America — provides a cultural bridge that facilitates integration.
Brazil would not be doing Israel a favor. Brazil would be making the best economic decision in its history.
This chapter is unique in the proposal: it presents not an argument or a plan but an actual legal document — a draft bilateral agreement for the establishment of an Israeli autonomous region in a host nation.
The draft is written as an international treaty in the full legal format: preamble, definitions, operative articles, annexes, and signature provisions.
Article I defines the territorial scope. Article II establishes the governance framework. Article III addresses citizenship and residency. Article IV covers economic arrangements.
Article V presents security arrangements: the Israeli community’s right to maintain a self-defense force, and coordination with the host nation’s armed forces.
Article VI addresses cultural and religious rights: the protection of Hebrew as an official language, the right to maintain Jewish religious institutions, and the preservation of Israeli cultural heritage.
This is a model document designed to be adapted to the specific legal systems and cultural contexts of whichever host nation ultimately participates — it is ready to be used, today, as a starting point.
This chapter is the proof that the proposal is ready to be signed.
This chapter steps back from operational detail and presents the complete strategic benefit analysis: for each party involved, what they gain and why those gains are worth the risks and costs.
Israel gains security without occupation, international normalization, and full financial compensation. Palestine gains actual statehood, territorial sovereignty, and the actual return of the diaspora.
Qatar gains control of the most strategically valuable real estate in the Middle East, the role of essential regional power broker, and a financial return that exceeds any alternative use of its capital.
The United States gains the foreign policy achievement that has eluded every administration since Truman — the resolution of the conflict that has consumed American diplomatic resources and driven anti-American sentiment for seven decades.
The Arab world gains the permanent removal of the conflict that has distorted Arab politics, justified authoritarian governance, and prevented economic integration for three generations.
Brazil and potential host nations gain an unprecedented influx of human capital, technology, and investment that transforms their development trajectory.
The most important benefit of all: the children who will grow up without knowing what it was to live in fear of this conflict — who will read about it in history books and struggle to understand how anyone allowed it to continue so long.
The United States has been involved in every significant attempt to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict since 1948 — and its involvement in this proposal is not optional but essential.
U.S. leverage is documented specifically: $3.8 billion in annual military aid to Israel, decades of UN Security Council diplomatic protection, and deep economic relationships with both Israel and Qatar.
The American national interest argument is made directly: ending this conflict reduces Middle East military deployment, frees diplomatic resources for the competition with China, and improves relationships with the Arab world.
The proposal offers the incumbent American President a foreign policy legacy comparable to Nixon’s opening to China or the Egypt-Israel peace treaty — the kind of achievement that defines a presidency and a generation.
Security guarantees for both Israel and the Palestinian state are specified in detail, including the legislative requirements and enforcement mechanisms that make those guarantees credible.
A specific scenario for American engagement is presented: the private outreach, the back-channel communications, the sequencing of public and private diplomacy, and the moment of announcement.
No other achievement in the history of American foreign policy would mean more to the world — or to the legacy of the leaders who made it possible.
This final chapter presents the vision of the world that the agreement makes possible — and a direct appeal to the decision-makers who hold that future in their hands.
Every element of the suffering documented in this proposal — the refugee camps, the security state, the regional wars, the terrorism — is the result of human decisions. And human decisions can be changed.
The 76-year history of failure is not evidence of intractability — it is 76 years of learning exactly what does not work, and therefore the foundation for a framework designed around those specific lessons.
The vision one generation after the agreement: a Palestinian state that has become the most successful new democracy in the Arab world, and an Israeli community in Brazil that has become a global technology powerhouse.
The chapter is a direct communication to heads of state: the historical moment created by October 7, 2023 and its aftermath has opened a window of possibility that did not exist before and will not remain open indefinitely.
The specific first step requires only a private meeting, in a neutral venue, between principals with the authority to begin. The blueprint already exists. The only thing needed is the decision to start.
The leaders who broker this agreement will be remembered alongside the greatest peacemakers in history. The rest is up to you.
This chapter addresses one of the most consequential secondary effects of the proposal: how Israeli-Palestinian peace removes Iran’s central justification for four decades of regional proxy warfare.
Iran’s entire regional strategy — funding Hamas, Hezbollah, Islamic Jihad, the Houthis in Yemen, and Shia militias in Iraq and Syria — is built on the ideological pillar of Palestinian liberation.
If the Palestinian state is established and the conflict is resolved, that ideological pillar disappears overnight, and with it the justification for maintaining a proxy network that costs Iran enormously in resources and international standing.
The chapter analyzes the specific domestic and international pressures that would constrain Iran’s ability to sustain the network without its ideological justification — pressures that are already substantial and would become overwhelming.
The nuclear question is addressed directly: the resolution of the Palestinian conflict eliminates the primary geopolitical logic that drives Iran’s nuclear ambitions, opening a genuine pathway to de-escalation.
A regional security architecture is presented: a collective framework involving Israel, Palestine, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, and Egypt, backed by U.S. and UN security guarantees, that changes Iran’s strategic calculus fundamentally.
One agreement. Two conflicts resolved. That is the magnitude of what is being offered.
Born in Haifa, Palestine in 1942 — six years before the State of Israel was established — Gadi Singer Zamir has lived at the intersection of this conflict his entire life.
He studied textile engineering in Wuppertal, Germany from 1959 to 1964, arriving only fourteen years after the end of World War II. During those years he became the top chess player at Elberfelder Chess Club, one of Germany's oldest clubs, established in 1851. He also tied for first place in the 1959 Israeli Youth Chess Championship.
He immigrated to the United States in 1971. He built several businesses including fabric stores in New York, Pick A Bagel in California with a Price Club contract, a modular systems company with a $225,000 Walmart contract, and a software distribution business.
His dentist and mentor, Imrich Gonczi, was a Holocaust survivor who shared his experiences at Auschwitz — an experience that profoundly shaped Gadi's worldview.
His mother's cousin was the late Amos Elon, one of Israel's most celebrated journalists and authors.
From 1997 to 2006, Gadi participated in and served as a coach assistant with Landmark Education, investing deeply in the study of human development and conflict resolution.
In 2007 he founded HUGE — Human Greatness Education — a seminar program based on a Universal Human Operating System framework. He trained hundreds of graduates and awarded Life License certificates.
From 2022 to 2023 he trained and volunteered with ERAN, Israel's emotional first aid hotline.
The idea for this proposal first came to Gadi in 1987, when he called a San Diego radio show hosted by former Mayor Roger Hedgecock and expressed his vision publicly for the first time.
He noticed that the word Israel contains within it the words 'is real.' His vision: in Brazil, Israel is going to be real.
Thirty-nine years later, the complete 27-chapter proposal was finalized in April 2026 — registered with the U.S. Copyright Office and the Writers Guild of America West.
• Conflict Resolution and Peace-building Advocacy
• Human Development and Life Coaching
• Strategic Planning and Proposal Writing
• Community Building and Seminar Leadership
•
"Who I Am Makes A Difference" — in collaboration with Henley's Bridges
Being the difference to benefit mankind for peace on earth
A Personal Note:
Imrich Gonczi, Gadi's father-in-law and mentor, was a Holocaust survivor who spent three years in Auschwitz. Prisoners were typically killed after six months to eliminate witnesses to the atrocities. Imrich survived beyond that point only because the Nazis chose to use him as a medical experiment subject, injecting mucus into his lungs. During his time at Auschwitz, he was also forced to work alongside Nazi Dr. Münch, assigned the harrowing task of transferring the bodies of the doctor's victims to the crematorium. He carried this unimaginable burden with quiet dignity for the rest of his life. His survival, his courage, and his humanity in the face of incomprehensible evil are among the deepest inspirations behind Gadi's lifelong dedication to peace, human dignity, and reconciliation.
Please complete the form below and Gadi Singer Zamir will respond personally.
Thank you. Gadi Singer Zamir will be in touch with you personally.
Click the ✕ button above or click outside this box to close